Here are some things I liked about the Twitter coverage:
- The Twitter account was set up in advance of the conference and by this morning had almost 50 followers. Posting about the purpose of the event gave folks enough info to follow it if they wanted. I probably wouldn't have ever heard of it if it wasn't on Twitter.
- The stream now exists as a persistent record of the event - almost like minutes. The links to the speaker's presentations were neat as well and by looking up @libconf (and reply's to @libconf) we can reflect on the speakers, revisit the topics and add our own responses. I for one will be thinking hard about Tim Coates pitch (possibly another post on that later!).
- Hampshire R&HIT web team (behind the Twittering) explained that it was experimental and a new venture. Which set the expectation. That said, they did very well in reporting what was going on and even managed to respond to some replies. There were about 100 tweets from libconf on the day - no mean feat I'm sure with everything else going on.
Well done Hampshire!
I will be suggesting to Hannah (YLG) that she Twitter at our conference in September - wonder if she can keep it up for 3 whole days?
ReplyDeleteI think it's a great way to allow people who can't attend to engage with a conference or event.
ReplyDeletep.s. I'm sure Hannah will cope admirably :-)